GeForce 9400 GT vs FirePro S10000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S10000 with GeForce 9400 GT, including specs and performance data.

S10000
2012, $3,599
6 GB GDDR5, 750 Watt
10.84
+2257%

S10000 outperforms 9400 GT by a whopping 2257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4601303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Power efficiency2.220.71
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTahitiG96C
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)27 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $79.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×216
Core clock speed825 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate106.4 ×24.400
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×20.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×24
TMUs112 ×28
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length305 mm168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×2512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×212.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Dual-link DVI support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

S10000 10.84
+2257%
9400 GT 0.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

S10000 4537
+2275%
Samples: 8
9400 GT 191
Samples: 1417

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.84 0.46
Recency 12 November 2012 27 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 50 Watt

S10000 has a 2256.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

9400 GT, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

The FirePro S10000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S10000
FirePro S10000
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
GeForce 9400 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 40 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 523 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 or GeForce 9400 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.