ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT vs FirePro S10000 Passive

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameTahitiR420
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2012 (11 years ago)21 September 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $179

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed825 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Wattno data
Texture fill rate106.48.000
Floating-point processing power3.405 gflopsno data
ROPs3216
TMUs11216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA
Dual-link DVI support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 21 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

S10000 Passive has an age advantage of 8 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S10000 Passive and All-In-Wonder X800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
FirePro S10000 Passive
ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT
All-In-Wonder X800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.