GeForce GTX 260 216 vs FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTahitiGT200
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2014 (10 years ago)16 September 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $299

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792216
Core clock speed825 MHz576 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt182 Watt
Texture fill rate106.441.47
Floating-point performance3.405 gflops0.5365 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB896 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1998 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2014 16 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 182 Watt

S10000 Passive 12GB has an age advantage of 5 years, a 585.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 260 216, on the other hand, has 106% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 21 vote

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.