Quadro FX 4000 vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.13
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameBlackcombNV40
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2011 (15 years ago)1 April 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed680 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt142 Watt
Texture fill rate32.644.500
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs4812
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 1 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 142 Watt

FirePro M8900 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 89% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and Quadro FX 4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro FX 4000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 22 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or Quadro FX 4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.