NVS 4200M vs FirePro M8900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data0.01
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBlackcomb XTGF119
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2011 (13 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$267 $229

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96048
Core clock speed680 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate32.646.480
Floating-point performance1,305.6 gflops155.52 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on FirePro M8900 and NVS 4200M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data2.1

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 12 April 2011 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and NVS 4200M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
NVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS 4200M

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 122 votes

Rate NVS 4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.