Quadro 5010M vs FirePro M8900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated614
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.59
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBlackcomb XTN12E-Q5
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2011 (13 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$267 $134

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960384
Core clock speed680 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate32.6421.60
Floating-point performance1,305.6 gflops691.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro M8900 and Quadro 5010M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5 ECC
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and Quadro 5010M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 5 votes

Rate Quadro 5010M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.