FirePro M4000 vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.87
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameBlackcombChelsea
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2011 (14 years ago)27 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960512
Core clock speed680 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate32.6421.60
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4832
L1 Cache192 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportn/an/a
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Form factorMXM-BMXM-A
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 27 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 33 Watt

FirePro M8900 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FirePro M4000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 127% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and FirePro M4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or FirePro M4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.