FirePro M4170 vs ATI FirePro M7740

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M7740 and FirePro M4170, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI M7740
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
2.00

M4170 outperforms M7740 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking935845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.57no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameM97Opal
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date4 August 2009 (16 years ago)23 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed650 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors826 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.8021.60
Floating-point processing power0.832 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3224
L1 Cache128 KB96 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed846 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.14 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Fortnite 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Valorant 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Fortnite 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Valorant 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Valorant 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Valorant 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Valorant 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.00 2.79
Recency 4 August 2009 23 April 2015
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

FirePro M4170 has a 40% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro M4170 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M7740 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate FirePro M7740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate FirePro M4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M7740 or FirePro M4170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.