GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs FirePro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking762not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.87no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameChelseaG80
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 June 2012 (13 years ago)19 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512112
Core clock speed675 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6028.00
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs3228
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB640 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2012 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 640 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 150 Watt

FirePro M4000 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 354.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4000 and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M4000 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 310 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M4000 or GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.