GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBlackcombG80
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date12 April 2011 (14 years ago)19 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960112
Core clock speed680 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate32.6428.00
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs3220
TMUs4828
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB640 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 640 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

FirePro M8900 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 310 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.