ATI Radeon HD 3690 vs FirePro M2000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1080not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.31no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameTurksRV670
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)30 March 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480320
Core clock speed500 MHz670 MHz
Number of transistors716 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0010.72
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.4288 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz830 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s26.56 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
StereoOutput3D+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 30 March 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro M2000 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M2000 and Radeon HD 3690. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 3690 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
ATI Radeon HD 3690
Radeon HD 3690

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 3690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.