Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs FirePro D700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 450 Pro 460 Pro 555 Pro 555X Pro 560 Pro 560X Pro 570 Pro 570X Pro 575 Pro 580 Pro 580X Pro WX 3200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D700 and Radeon Pro WX 3200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
12.96
+141%

D700 outperforms Pro 3200 by a whopping 141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.60
Power efficiency3.656.39
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiPolaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)2 July 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed850 MHz1082 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate108.834.62
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12832
L1 Cache512 KB160 KB
L2 Cache768 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1370 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+137%
19
−137%
4K18−20
+125%
8
−125%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.47
4Kno data24.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how FirePro D700 and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D700 is 137% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro D700 is 125% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.96 5.38
Recency 18 January 2014 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 65 Watt

FirePro D700 has a 141% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 322% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
vs
Quadro M600M Quadro M600M
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
vs
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
vs
Arc B580 Arc B580
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
vs
Arc Graphics 140T Arc Graphics 140T
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
RTX 5050 GeForce RTX 5050
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
HD 7870 Radeon HD 7870
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
HD 8570 OEM Radeon HD 8570 OEM
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
HD Graphics P3000 HD Graphics P3000
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
FirePro V4900 FirePro V4900
vs
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 40 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 112 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D700 or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.