Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs FirePro S10000 Passive

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.23
Power efficiencyno data6.29
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiPolaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)2 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584 ×2640
Core clock speed825 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×234.62
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×21.385 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×216
TMUs112 ×232
L1 Cache448 KB160 KB
L2 Cache768 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×264 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 65 Watt

S10000 Passive has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1054% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S10000 Passive and Radeon Pro WX 3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 93 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 Passive or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.