GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs FirePro D700

Place in performance ranking	347	346
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	5.09	5.11
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Tahiti	N17P-G1 Max-Q
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	18 January 2014 (10 years ago)	3 January 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	$413	$1140

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro D700 and GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	768
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1151 – 1290 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1290 – 1417 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	40 - 46 Watt
Texture fill rate	108.8	68.02
Floating-point performance	3,482 gflops	2,177 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on FirePro D700 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	279 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5480 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	263.0 GB/s	112.1 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	No outputs
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	55−60 −5.5%	58 +5.5%
1440p	27−30 −7.4%	29 +7.4%
4K	18−20 −5.6%	19 +5.6%

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	13.84	13.86
Recency	18 January 2014	3 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	40 Watt