Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs FirePro D500

Place in performance ranking	401	659
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	2.45	0.33
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Gen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015)
GPU code name	Tahiti	Broadwell GT3e
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	18 January 2014 (10 years ago)	2 June 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price	$475	$645

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro D500 has 642% better value for money than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	48
Core clock speed	725 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1150 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	69.60	40.80
Floating-point performance	2,227 gflops	883.2 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on FirePro D500 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x1
Length	279 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	384 Bit	eDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	243.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI

No outputs

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.80

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	10.36	3.91
Recency	18 January 2014	2 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	15 Watt