Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs FirePro D500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D500 D700 S9000 S9010 S9050 S10000 S10000 Passive S10000 Passive 12GB W8000 W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
12EU Mobile 400 405 5300 5500 5600 6000 Iris Graphics 6100 Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D500 with Iris Pro Graphics 6200, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D500
2014
3 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
9.79
+171%

D500 outperforms Pro Graphics 6200 by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking484763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.7718.65
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameTahitiBroadwell GT3e
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)5 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536384
Core clock speed725 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate69.6052.80
Floating-point processing power2.227 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs326
TMUs9648
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.79 3.61
Recency 18 January 2014 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 15 Watt

FirePro D500 has a 171.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1726.7% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
FirePro W8000 FirePro W8000
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Iris Pro Graphics 6200
vs
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
FirePro S9170 FirePro S9170
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB 3050 6 GB
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
vs
CMP 50HX 50HX
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
vs
9800 GTX 9800 GTX
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
vs
Arc A380M A380M
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
FirePro W2100 W2100
FirePro D700 FirePro D700
vs
RTX A5500 A5500
Sky 500 AMD Sky 500
vs
R9 M290X Mac Edition M290X Mac Edition
Sky 700 AMD Sky 700
vs
ATI FireMV 2200 2200
Sky 700 AMD Sky 700
vs
Pro W6900X W6900X
Sky 700 AMD Sky 700
vs
Arc A350 A350

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 22 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 92 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D500 or Iris Pro Graphics 6200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.