HD Graphics 400 vs FirePro D500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D500 with HD Graphics 400, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D500
2014
3 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
9.88
+850%

D500 outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 850% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4901146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.7813.35
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameTahitiBraswell GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (12 years ago)1 April 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153696
Core clock speed725 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate69.607.200
Floating-point processing power2.227 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs322
TMUs9612
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.88 1.04
Recency 18 January 2014 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 6 Watt

FirePro D500 has a 850% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 4467% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D500 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 400 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 22 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D500 or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.