Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs FirePro D300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
D300 R5000 S7000 W4000 W5000 W5000 DVI W7000 Radeon Sky 500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Steam Deck 8CU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D300 with Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D300
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.26

Steam Deck 8CU outperforms D300 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
Steam Deck 8CU Steam Deck 8CU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking507481
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.73no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code namePitcairnRDNA 2 Sephiroth
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)9 November 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280512
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate68.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data
L1 Cache320 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1270 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−20.8%
29
+20.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how FirePro D300 and Steam Deck 8CU compete in popular games:

  • Steam Deck 8CU is 21% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.26 10.21
Recency 18 January 2014 9 November 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

Steam Deck 8CU has a 10.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D300 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60-8Q
Steam Deck 8CU Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
FirePro W4300 AMD FirePro W4300
vs
RX 640 RX 640
FirePro S9050 AMD FirePro S9050
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
FirePro W8100 AMD FirePro W8100
vs
GTX 1630 GTX 1630
FirePro W5100 AMD FirePro W5100
vs
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
FirePro W9100 AMD FirePro W9100
vs
P106-100 P106 100
FirePro D500 AMD FirePro D500
vs
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT
FirePro D500 AMD FirePro D500
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
FirePro D700 AMD FirePro D700
vs
Pro W6800 Pro W6800
FirePro D700 AMD FirePro D700
vs
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Graphics 128EU Mobile
Sky 500 AMD Radeon Sky 500
vs
A800 PCIe 40 GB PCIe 40 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 35 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Steam Deck 8CU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D300 or Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.