Radeon RX 6600 XT vs FirePro D300

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D300 with Radeon RX 6600 XT, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D300
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.73

RX 6600 XT outperforms D300 by a whopping 324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44990
Place by popularitynot in top-10079
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.43
Power efficiency4.6418.47
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code namePitcairnNavi 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802048
Core clock speed850 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate68.00331.4
Floating-point processing power2.176 TFLOPS10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length242 mm190 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−347%
134
+347%
1440p18−20
−333%
78
+333%
4K10−12
−340%
44
+340%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.83
1440pno data4.86
4Kno data8.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+0%
75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 257
+0%
257
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Metro Exodus 131
+0%
131
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+0%
75
+0%
Dota 2 147
+0%
147
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 209
+0%
209
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 135
+0%
135
+0%
Metro Exodus 100
+0%
100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+0%
66
+0%
Dota 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 68
+0%
68
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+0%
68
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+0%
38
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 64
+0%
64
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+0%
64
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how FirePro D300 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 347% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 333% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 340% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.73 41.30
Recency 18 January 2014 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 160 Watt

FirePro D300 has 6.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 324.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D300 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4521 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.