Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs FirePro D300

Place in the ranking	443	131
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	6.89
Power efficiency	4.70	5.29
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Pitcairn	Vega 20
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	18 January 2014 (10 years ago)	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	4096
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1720 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	475 Watt
Texture fill rate	68.00	440.3
Floating-point processing power	2.176 TFLOPS	14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	80	256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	Apple MPX
Length	242 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	162.6 GB/s	1.02 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.20	36.34
Recency	18 January 2014	3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	475 Watt

FirePro D300 has 216.7% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II Duo, on the other hand, has a 256.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D300 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.