Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs FirePro D300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking421not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.95no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePitcairnEllesmere
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 January 2014 (10 years old)24 April 2017 (6 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current price$260 $173 (0.2x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802304
Core clock speed850 MHz1243 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate68.00179.0
Floating-point performance2,176 gflops2x 5,728 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length242 mm305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5080 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 18 January 2014 24 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between FirePro D300 and Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 24 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 34 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.