Quadro K200M vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2005−2008)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV380GK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2008 (16 years ago)22 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed250 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors75 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00013.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1MXM-A (3.0)
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed406 MBps800 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.496 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VHDCINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 35 Watt

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 has 75% lower power consumption.

Quadro K200M, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and Quadro K200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 is a desktop card while Quadro K200M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
NVIDIA Quadro K200M
Quadro K200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.