Quadro K200M vs FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV380GK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2008 (16 years ago)22 August 2014 (9 years ago)
Current price$147 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed250 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors75 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00013.60
Floating-point performanceno data326.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and Quadro K200M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1MXM-A (3.0)
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed406 MBps1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.496 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VHDCINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDAno data3.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and Quadro K200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 is a desktop card while Quadro K200M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
NVIDIA Quadro K200M
Quadro K200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.