GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated269
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Power efficiencyno data27.98
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV516TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2007 (17 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed600 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors105 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40095.04
Floating-point processing powerno data3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MBps1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 50 Watt

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 has 56.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1620 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.