Quadro P2200 vs ATI FireGL X1-256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.73
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameR300GP106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 July 2002 (23 years ago)10 June 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speed325 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1493 MHz
Number of transistors110 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate2.600119.4
Floating-point processing powerno data3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB5 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s200.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 75 Watt

ATI FireGL X1-256 has 102.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL X1-256 and Quadro P2200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL X1-256
FireGL X1-256
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 429 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL X1-256 or Quadro P2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.