ATI Radeon X800 SE vs ATI FireGL V7700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRV670R423
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date19 November 2007 (17 years ago)4 October 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed777 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors666 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate12.433.400
Floating-point processing power0.4973 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs168
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1126 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth72.06 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 4 October 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm

ATI FireGL V7700 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7700 and Radeon X800 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7700 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X800 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V7700
FireGL V7700
ATI Radeon X800 SE
Radeon X800 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireGL V7700 or Radeon X800 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.