FirePro S9010 vs GeForce Go 7900 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG73Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2006 (19 years ago)24 August 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed350 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors177 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate4.20089.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs12112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed333 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.31 GB/s240.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 24 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 200 Watt

Go 7900 SE has 900% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9010, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 SE and FirePro S9010. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 SE is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9010 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 SE
GeForce Go 7900 SE
AMD FirePro S9010
FirePro S9010

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FirePro S9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 SE or FirePro S9010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.