GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs ATI FireGL V7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameR600GK106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 November 2007 (17 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240960
Core clock speed600 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1098 MHz
Number of transistors720 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)127 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20087.84
Floating-point processing power0.288 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1224
TMUs1280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length254 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s192.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.0 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 127 Watt 150 Watt

ATI FireGL V7600 has 18.1% lower power consumption.

GTX 750 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL V7600 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL V7600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL V7600
FireGL V7600
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 88 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.