Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs Data Center GPU Max NEXT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameRialto BridgeMeteor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20480384
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors100,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)800 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate2,04843.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.382 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUs128024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
WidthOAM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width8192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3.1 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3,205 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 800 Watt 28 Watt

Data Center GPU Max NEXT has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 2757.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Data Center GPU Max NEXT and Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Data Center GPU Max NEXT is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 46 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.