Arc A370M vs CMP 170HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.82
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA100DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 September 2021 (4 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44801024
Core clock speed1140 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate394.899.20
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs28064
Tensor Cores280no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache13.1 MB1.5 MB
L2 Cache8 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1458 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,493 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2021 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

CMP 170HX has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 614.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between CMP 170HX and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that CMP 170HX is a workstation graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 188 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about CMP 170HX or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.