Arc A370M vs A100 SXM4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.82
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA100DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (5 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores69121024
Core clock speed1410 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate609.199.20
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs16032
TMUs43264
Tensor Cores432no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache20.3 MB1.5 MB
L2 Cache40 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount40 GB4 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 35 Watt

A100 SXM4 has a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1042.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 188 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.