Matrox Marvel G400-TV vs Atari VCS 800 GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameBanded KestrelToucan
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 December 2020 (3 years ago)20 May 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate14.410.25
Floating-point processing power0.4612 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs122

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Length295 mm150 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.1None
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2020 20 May 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

Atari VCS 800 GPU has an age advantage of 21 year, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atari VCS 800 GPU and Matrox Marvel G400-TV. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Atari VCS 800 GPU
Atari VCS 800 GPU
Matrox Marvel G400-TV
Marvel G400-TV

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5 votes

Rate Atari VCS 800 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Marvel G400-TV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.