RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Arc Pro A30M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Pro A30M and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Pro A30M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
13.26

3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Arc Pro A30M by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking39583
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.3435.87
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date8 August 2022 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10245120
Core clock speed1500 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0247.2
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Cores840
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Pro A30M 13.26
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 44.58
+236%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Pro A30M 5862
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile Samples: 500 19715
+236%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.26 44.58
Recency 8 August 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt

Arc Pro A30M has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 236.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro A30M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 41 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Pro A30M or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.