ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs Arc Graphics 140V
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Graphics 140V with Radeon HD 5450, including specs and performance data.
Arc Graphics 140V outperforms ATI HD 5450 by a whopping 3773% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 398 | 1307 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.25 |
| Architecture | Xe² (2024) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | Lunar Lake iGPU | Cedar |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) | 4 February 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 80 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 292 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 3 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 19 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 5.200 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 4 |
| TMUs | no data | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 170 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5x | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- Other tests
- Passmark
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 40
+3900%
| 1−2
−3900%
|
| 1440p | 23 | 0−1 |
| 4K | 29 | 0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 87
+4250%
|
2−3
−4250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 41
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+5400%
|
1−2
−5400%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85
+4150%
|
2−3
−4150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 51
+5000%
|
1−2
−5000%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
+7200%
|
1−2
−7200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+3900%
|
1−2
−3900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+4500%
|
1−2
−4500%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+5400%
|
2−3
−5400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+5400%
|
1−2
−5400%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 42
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 170−180
+4325%
|
4−5
−4325%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 45
+4400%
|
1−2
−4400%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
+7200%
|
1−2
−7200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+3900%
|
1−2
−3900%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 44
+4300%
|
1−2
−4300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 23 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+4500%
|
1−2
−4500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 62
+6100%
|
1−2
−6100%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+5400%
|
2−3
−5400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+5400%
|
1−2
−5400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 42
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 19 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+4500%
|
1−2
−4500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 28 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 110−120
+5400%
|
2−3
−5400%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
+7200%
|
1−2
−7200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
+4650%
|
2−3
−4650%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+5150%
|
2−3
−5150%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+4367%
|
3−4
−4367%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 35 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 65−70
+6700%
|
1−2
−6700%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 12−14 | 0−1 |
This is how Arc Graphics 140V and ATI HD 5450 compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 140V is 3900% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.62 | 0.30 |
| Recency | 24 September 2024 | 4 February 2010 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 40 nm |
Arc Graphics 140V has a 3773.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5450 in performance tests.
Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5450 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
