FirePro D500 vs Arc Graphics 140V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140V with FirePro D500, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 140V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
12.36
+25.1%

Graphics 140V outperforms D500 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434484
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.77
ArchitectureXe² (2024)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUTahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)18 January 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81536
Core clock speedno data725 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data274 Watt
Texture fill rateno data69.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.227 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data96
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB3 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1270 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data243.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
+30%
30−35
−30%
1440p26
+44.4%
18−21
−44.4%
4K21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 87
+33.8%
65−70
−33.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+30.8%
65−70
−30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Far Cry 5 52
+30%
40−45
−30%
Fortnite 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Valorant 110−120
+29.4%
85−90
−29.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+26.4%
140−150
−26.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Far Cry 5 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Fortnite 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Valorant 137
+37%
100−105
−37%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Far Cry 5 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Valorant 110−120
+29.4%
85−90
−29.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+25.3%
75−80
−25.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+26.3%
80−85
−26.3%
Valorant 114
+26.7%
90−95
−26.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Far Cry 5 37
+37%
27−30
−37%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Valorant 65−70
+36%
50−55
−36%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

This is how Arc Graphics 140V and FirePro D500 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 30% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 44% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 31% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.36 9.88
Recency 24 September 2024 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 25.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook graphics card while FirePro D500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 64 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 22 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or FirePro D500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.