Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile vs Arc Graphics 140T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81920 ×2
Core clock speedno data945 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data165.6 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.299 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data64 ×2
TMUsno data120 ×2
Tensor Coresno data240 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data30 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cache8 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 27 May 2019

Arc Graphics 140T has an age advantage of 5 years.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 140T and Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140T is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 140T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 33 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140T or Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.