Arc 140T Mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameTU106Arrow Lake
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920 ×21024
Core clock speed945 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate165.6 ×2150.4
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS ×24.813 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×232
TMUs120 ×264
Tensor Cores240 ×2128
Ray Tracing Cores30 ×28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width192 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2019 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 140T Mobile has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 357.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc 140T Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.