GeForce MX150 vs Arc Graphics 140T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce MX150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 140T
2025
13.96
+149%

Arc Graphics 140T outperforms MX150 by a whopping 149% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking394639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data40.46
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP108
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)17 May 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8384
Core clock speedno data937 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1038 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,800 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.91
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140T 13.96
+149%
GeForce MX150 5.60

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140T 5634
+149%
GeForce MX150 2259

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 140T 12506
+178%
GeForce MX150 4494

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc Graphics 140T 58039
+428%
GeForce MX150 10992

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 140T 9251
+165%
GeForce MX150 3488

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc Graphics 140T 51620
+170%
GeForce MX150 19132

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+70.4%
27
−70.4%
1440p70−75
+133%
30
−133%
4K40−45
+122%
18
−122%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+208%
24−27
−208%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Dead Island 2 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+53.8%
39
−53.8%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+208%
24−27
−208%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+164%
11
−164%
Dead Island 2 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Far Cry 5 48
+182%
17
−182%
Fortnite 75−80
+32.2%
59
−32.2%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+132%
25
−132%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+187%
14−16
−187%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+92.3%
26
−92.3%
Valorant 110−120
+16%
100
−16%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+87.5%
32
−87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+208%
24−27
−208%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+116%
87
−116%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+314%
7
−314%
Dead Island 2 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Far Cry 5 45
+181%
16
−181%
Fortnite 75−80
+129%
34
−129%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+176%
21
−176%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+187%
14−16
−187%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+11.5%
26
−11.5%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+367%
6
−367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+127%
22
−127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+89.5%
19
−89.5%
Valorant 110−120
+16%
100
−16%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+131%
26
−131%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Dead Island 2 50−55
+189%
18−20
−189%
Far Cry 5 40
+186%
14
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+314%
14
−314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+233%
15
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+227%
11
−227%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+225%
24
−225%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+87.3%
55
−87.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Valorant 140−150
+118%
66
−118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Dead Island 2 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+162%
12−14
−162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+52.9%
16−18
−52.9%
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Valorant 75−80
+127%
33
−127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dead Island 2 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 68
+0%
68
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 43
+0%
43
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dead Island 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 24
+0%
24
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140T and GeForce MX150 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T is 70% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140T is 133% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Graphics 140T is 122% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140T is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T is ahead in 57 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.96 5.60
Recency 6 January 2025 17 May 2017

Arc Graphics 140T has a 149.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 years.

The Arc Graphics 140T is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX150 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 140T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1718 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140T or GeForce MX150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.