GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs Arc Graphics 140T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140T with GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 140T
2025
13.30
+10.4%

Arc Graphics 140T outperforms GTX 1050 3 GB by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking393422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.25
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)21 May 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8768
Core clock speedno data1392 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1518 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data72.86
Floating-point processing powerno data2.332 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data84.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140T 13.30
+10.4%
GTX 1050 3 GB 12.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140T 5634
+10.4%
GTX 1050 3 GB 5105

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 48
+20%
40−45
−20%
Fortnite 75−80
+11.4%
70−75
−11.4%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Valorant 110−120
+16%
100−105
−16%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+16.9%
160−170
−16.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 45
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Fortnite 75−80
+11.4%
70−75
−11.4%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Valorant 110−120
+16%
100−105
−16%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+11.4%
70−75
−11.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+13.3%
90−95
−13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Valorant 140−150
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Valorant 75−80
+15.4%
65−70
−15.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

This is how Arc Graphics 140T and GTX 1050 3 GB compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T is 13% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.30 12.05
Recency 6 January 2025 21 May 2018

Arc Graphics 140T has a 10.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 6 years.

The Arc Graphics 140T is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140T is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 140T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 379 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140T or GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.