UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs Arc Graphics 130V
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Graphics 130V and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc Graphics 130V outperforms UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 424 | 563 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe² (2024) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | Lunar Lake iGPU | Alder Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 64 |
| Boost clock speed | 1850 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 3 nm | 10 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR5x | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- Other tests
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 31
+47.6%
| 21
−47.6%
|
| 1440p | 18−20
+63.6%
| 11
−63.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Atomic Heart | 27−30
+12.5%
|
24
−12.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 51
+54.5%
|
30−35
−54.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+27.8%
|
18
−27.8%
|
| Atomic Heart | 27−30
+50%
|
18
−50%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+65.5%
|
27−30
−65.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 47
+42.4%
|
30−35
−42.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+53.3%
|
15
−53.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 41
+128%
|
18
−128%
|
| Fortnite | 65−70
+58.5%
|
40−45
−58.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+56.7%
|
30−33
−56.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35
+36%
|
25
−36%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+60%
|
24−27
−60%
|
| Valorant | 100−105
+37%
|
70−75
−37%
|
| Atomic Heart | 27−30
+108%
|
13
−108%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+65.5%
|
27−30
−65.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 25
−32%
|
30−35
+32%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170
+47.7%
|
100−110
−47.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+109%
|
11
−109%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 37
+94.7%
|
19
−94.7%
|
| Fortnite | 65−70
+58.5%
|
40−45
−58.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+56.7%
|
30−33
−56.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35
+54.5%
|
22
−54.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 41
+242%
|
12
−242%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+100%
|
11
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+60%
|
24−27
−60%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+26.1%
|
23
−26.1%
|
| Valorant | 100−105
+37%
|
70−75
−37%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+65.5%
|
27−30
−65.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+64.3%
|
14−16
−64.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 33
+83.3%
|
18
−83.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+56.7%
|
30−33
−56.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+60%
|
24−27
−60%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+164%
|
11
−164%
|
| Valorant | 100−105
+355%
|
22
−355%
|
| Fortnite | 65−70
+58.5%
|
40−45
−58.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22
+81.8%
|
10−12
−81.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 80−85
+59.6%
|
50−55
−59.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+167%
|
6
−167%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+76.9%
|
35−40
−76.9%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+57.9%
|
75−80
−57.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+142%
|
12−14
−142%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14
−71.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+68.8%
|
16−18
−68.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
| Atomic Heart | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+73.5%
|
30−35
−73.5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+57.1%
|
7−8
−57.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| Dota 2 | 53
+0%
|
53
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 49
+0%
|
49
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
This is how Arc Graphics 130V and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130V is 48% faster in 1080p
- Arc Graphics 130V is 64% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 355% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 32% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130V is ahead in 57 tests (93%)
- UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.18 | 6.18 |
| Recency | 24 September 2024 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 10 nm |
Arc Graphics 130V has a 64.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
