Tesla K8 vs Arc Graphics 130V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 130V Graphics 140V
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2 K240Q K260Q K280Q K500 K520 Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V with Tesla K8, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 130V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
10.76
+17.3%

Graphics 130V outperforms K8 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
Tesla K8 Tesla K8

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking469520
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.06
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUGK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)16 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71536
Core clock speedno data693 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHz811 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data103.8
Floating-point processing powerno data2.491 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
1440p23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 51
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 43
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Fortnite 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Valorant 100−105
+17.6%
85−90
−17.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+19%
21−24
−19%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+23.1%
130−140
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Fortnite 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Valorant 100−105
+17.6%
85−90
−17.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Valorant 100−105
+17.6%
85−90
−17.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Valorant 110−120
+19%
100−105
−19%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Valorant 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and Tesla K8 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is 26% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 130V is 28% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.76 9.17
Recency 24 September 2024 16 September 2014
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 17% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K8 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook graphics card while Tesla K8 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Arc Graphics 140V Intel Graphics 140V
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
HD 8870M 8870M
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
R7 (Carrizo) (Carrizo)
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5750 5750
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
GT 740A 740A
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
GRID K340 K340
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
GRID K100 K100
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
GRID K240Q K240Q
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
GRID K260Q K260Q
Arc Graphics 130V Intel Graphics 130V
vs
GRID K280Q K280Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 70 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Tesla K8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or Tesla K8, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.