Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs Arc Graphics 130V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon RX 560X Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 130V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
10.87
+9.5%

Arc Graphics 130V outperforms RX 560X Mobile by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking452473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.65
ArchitectureXe² (2024)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUPolaris 21
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71024
Core clock speedno data1275 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHz1202 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data81.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.611 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1450 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data92.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130V 10.87
+9.5%
RX 560X Mobile 9.93

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 130V 9633
+17.3%
RX 560X Mobile 8212

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc Graphics 130V 41881
+111%
RX 560X Mobile 19829

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 130V 8356
+32%
RX 560X Mobile 6329

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc Graphics 130V 50121
+41.1%
RX 560X Mobile 35511

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc Graphics 130V 3242
+81.2%
RX 560X Mobile 1789

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD33
−3%
34
+3%
1440p23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 51
−5.9%
50−55
+5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
23
+0%
God of War 21−24
−40.9%
31
+40.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−6.1%
52
+6.1%
Counter-Strike 2 47
−14.9%
50−55
+14.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+35.3%
17
−35.3%
Far Cry 5 43
+10.3%
39
−10.3%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−10.6%
52
+10.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
34
+0%
God of War 21−24
−18.2%
26
+18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−25%
50
+25%
Valorant 100−110
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+11.4%
44
−11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 25
−116%
50−55
+116%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+32.8%
122
−32.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+53.3%
15
−53.3%
Far Cry 5 39
+8.3%
36
−8.3%
Fortnite 65−70
+50%
44
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−4.3%
49
+4.3%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+9.7%
31
−9.7%
God of War 21−24
+4.8%
21
−4.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 39
+8.3%
36
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+10%
20
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−5%
42
+5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−24.1%
36
+24.1%
Valorant 100−110
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+25.6%
39
−25.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+76.9%
13
−76.9%
Far Cry 5 36
+9.1%
33
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+23.7%
38
−23.7%
God of War 21−24
+267%
6
−267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+33.3%
30
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+31.8%
22
−31.8%
Valorant 100−110
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+100%
33
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+9.1%
75−80
−9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+31.4%
50−55
−31.4%
Valorant 120−130
+8.1%
110−120
−8.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+16%
24−27
−16%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
God of War 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Valorant 55−60
+11.3%
50−55
−11.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 71
+0%
71
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 66
+0%
66
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 560X Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 130V is 10% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in God of War, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 267% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 116% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V performs better in 45 tests (69%)
  • RX 560X Mobile performs better in 11 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.87 9.93
Recency 24 September 2024 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon RX 560X Mobile.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 30 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 439 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or Radeon RX 560X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.