Radeon R7 M265 vs Arc Graphics 130V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon R7 M265, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 130V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
10.21
+744%

Arc Graphics 130V outperforms R7 M265 by a whopping 744% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4251021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUTopaz
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)20 May 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7384
Compute unitsno data6
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data23.52
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7526 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2DirectX® 11
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno dataNot Listed
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130V 10.21
+744%
R7 M265 1.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4564
+745%
R7 M265 540

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 130V 9523
+406%
R7 M265 1882

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 130V 8255
+518%
R7 M265 1336

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD31
+121%
14
−121%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+750%
6−7
−750%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Counter-Strike 2 47
+840%
5−6
−840%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Fortnite 65−70
+1525%
4−5
−1525%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
Valorant 100−110
+197%
30−35
−197%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+437%
30−33
−437%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
Fortnite 65−70
+1525%
4−5
−1525%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+4000%
1−2
−4000%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+233%
9
−233%
Valorant 100−110
+197%
30−35
−197%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 33
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Valorant 100−110
+197%
30−35
−197%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+1525%
4−5
−1525%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+950%
8−9
−950%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+446%
12−14
−446%
Valorant 120−130
+2320%
5−6
−2320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 55−60
+743%
7−8
−743%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and R7 M265 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is 121% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 4000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is ahead in 41 test (93%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.21 1.21
Recency 24 September 2024 20 May 2014
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 743.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M265 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
AMD Radeon R7 M265
Radeon R7 M265

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 116 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or Radeon R7 M265, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.