ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs Arc Graphics 130V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4641606
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPURS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72
Core clock speedno data183 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHz180 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm180 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.37
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_27.0
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4509
+225350%
Samples: 725
ATI IGP 340M 2
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34no data
1440p23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 51 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 47 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 43 no data
Fortnite 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Valorant 100−110
+339%
21−24
−339%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 25 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1678%
9−10
−1678%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 39 no data
Fortnite 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Valorant 100−110
+339%
21−24
−339%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 36 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Valorant 100−110
+339%
21−24
−339%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 2500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V performs better in 22 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2024 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 3 nm 180 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has an age advantage of 21 years, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 130V and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 53 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.