HD Graphics P4000 vs Arc Graphics 130V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V with HD Graphics P4000, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 130V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
10.23
+790%

Arc Graphics 130V outperforms HD Graphics P4000 by a whopping 790% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4251041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.03
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUIvy Bridge GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7128
Core clock speedno data650 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.32 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.1 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.0
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130V 10.23
+790%
HD Graphics P4000 1.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4570
+786%
HD Graphics P4000 516

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD31
+933%
3−4
−933%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+920%
5−6
−920%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Counter-Strike 2 47
+840%
5−6
−840%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Far Cry 5 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Fortnite 65−70
+829%
7−8
−829%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Valorant 100−110
+910%
10−11
−910%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+800%
18−20
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Far Cry 5 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
Fortnite 65−70
+829%
7−8
−829%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Valorant 100−110
+910%
10−11
−910%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Far Cry 5 33
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Valorant 100−110
+910%
10−11
−910%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+829%
7−8
−829%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+833%
9−10
−833%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+914%
7−8
−914%
Valorant 120−130
+908%
12−14
−908%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 55−60
+883%
6−7
−883%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and HD Graphics P4000 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is 933% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.23 1.15
Recency 24 September 2024 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 3 nm 22 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 789.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook card while HD Graphics P4000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
Intel HD Graphics P4000
HD Graphics P4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 102 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or HD Graphics P4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.