Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) vs Arc Graphics 140V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)RDNA 3+
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8128
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology3 nmno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xno data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Shared memory+no data
Resizable BAR+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212_2

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000). We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 102 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 22 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.