Radeon RX Vega 10 vs Arc Graphics 130T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130T and Radeon RX Vega 10, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 130T
2025
15.12
+289%

Arc Graphics 130T outperforms RX Vega 10 by a whopping 289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking369729
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.65
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameno dataRaven
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)8 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7640
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data52.04
Floating-point processing powerno data1.665 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130T 15.12
+289%
RX Vega 10 3.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130T 6337
+289%
RX Vega 10 1630

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 130T 9106
+169%
RX Vega 10 3389

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc Graphics 130T 30169
+165%
RX Vega 10 11391

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 130T 5173
+128%
RX Vega 10 2272

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc Graphics 130T 27791
+87.3%
RX Vega 10 14835

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30
+76.5%
17
−76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+118%
40
−118%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+167%
12
−167%
God of War 30−35
+182%
11
−182%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+247%
19
−247%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+164%
33
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+256%
9
−256%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+317%
12
−317%
Fortnite 85−90
+161%
33
−161%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+276%
17
−276%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+269%
13
−269%
God of War 30−35
+210%
10
−210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+280%
15
−280%
Valorant 120−130
+136%
50−55
−136%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+313%
16
−313%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+867%
9
−867%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+383%
42
−383%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+540%
5
−540%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+355%
11
−355%
Fortnite 85−90
+473%
15
−473%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+357%
14
−357%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+336%
11
−336%
God of War 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+70%
10
−70%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+433%
6
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+375%
12
−375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+242%
12
−242%
Valorant 120−130
+136%
50−55
−136%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+288%
17
−288%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+400%
10
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+237%
18−20
−237%
God of War 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+256%
16−18
−256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+413%
8
−413%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+274%
21−24
−274%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+280%
30−33
−280%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Valorant 150−160
+278%
40−45
−278%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
God of War 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Valorant 85−90
+325%
20−22
−325%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
God of War 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 32
+0%
32
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 130T and RX Vega 10 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130T is 76% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130T performs better in 55 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.12 3.89
Recency 6 January 2025 8 January 2019

Arc Graphics 130T has a 288.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The Arc Graphics 130T is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130T
Arc Graphics 130T
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1132 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130T or Radeon RX Vega 10, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.