Arc 130T Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking734not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Xe+ (2025)
GPU code nameRavenArrow Lake-H
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640896
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate52.04123.2
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs828
TMUs4056
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2019 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 10 has 250% lower power consumption.

Arc 130T Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1140 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 24 votes

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 10 or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.