Radeon HD 8790M vs Arc Graphics 130T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130T and Radeon HD 8790M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 130T
2025
15.91
+393%

Arc Graphics 130T outperforms HD 8790M by a whopping 393% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking366777
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameno dataMars
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)1 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7384
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no dataunknown
Texture fill rateno data21.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130T 15.91
+393%
HD 8790M 3.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130T 6418
+392%
HD 8790M 1305

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+364%
28
−364%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+790%
10−11
−790%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Dead Island 2 60−65
+578%
9−10
−578%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+509%
10−12
−509%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+790%
10−11
−790%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Dead Island 2 60−65
+578%
9−10
−578%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+467%
9−10
−467%
Fortnite 85−90
+412%
16−18
−412%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+333%
14−16
−333%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+513%
8−9
−513%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
Valorant 120−130
+163%
45−50
−163%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+509%
10−12
−509%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+790%
10−11
−790%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+181%
73
−181%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Dead Island 2 60−65
+578%
9−10
−578%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+467%
9−10
−467%
Fortnite 85−90
+412%
16−18
−412%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+333%
14−16
−333%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+513%
8−9
−513%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+556%
9−10
−556%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%
Valorant 120−130
+163%
45−50
−163%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+509%
10−12
−509%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Dead Island 2 60−65
+578%
9−10
−578%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+467%
9−10
−467%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+333%
14−16
−333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+412%
16−18
−412%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+404%
21−24
−404%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Valorant 150−160
+394%
30−35
−394%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+450%
8−9
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Dead Island 2 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+457%
7−8
−457%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Valorant 85−90
+438%
16−18
−438%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dead Island 2 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 130T and HD 8790M compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130T is 364% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130T is ahead in 54 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.91 3.23
Recency 6 January 2025 1 April 2013

Arc Graphics 130T has a 392.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 years.

The Arc Graphics 130T is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8790M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130T
Arc Graphics 130T
AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Radeon HD 8790M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 130T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 344 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8790M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130T or Radeon HD 8790M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.