Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc Graphics 130T
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Graphics 130T and Arc Graphics 130V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc Graphics 130T outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 369 | 444 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Xe+ (2025) | Xe² (2024) |
GPU code name | no data | Lunar Lake iGPU |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 7 |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | no data | 3 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | LPDDR5x |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
Shared memory | + | + |
Resizable BAR | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | no data | 12_2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 40−45
+21.2%
| 33
−21.2%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Baldur's Gate 3 | 30−33
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+68.6%
|
51
−68.6%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+39.1%
|
21−24
−39.1%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Baldur's Gate 3 | 30−33
+20%
|
25
−20%
|
Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+32.7%
|
45−50
−32.7%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+83%
|
47
−83%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+39.1%
|
21−24
−39.1%
|
Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+16.3%
|
43
−16.3%
|
Fortnite | 85−90
+28.8%
|
65−70
−28.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+31.3%
|
45−50
−31.3%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+34.3%
|
35−40
−34.3%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+40%
|
40−45
−40%
|
Valorant | 120−130
+20.6%
|
100−110
−20.6%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Baldur's Gate 3 | 30−33
+42.9%
|
21
−42.9%
|
Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+32.7%
|
45−50
−32.7%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+244%
|
25
−244%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 200−210
+23.3%
|
160−170
−23.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+39.1%
|
21−24
−39.1%
|
Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+28.2%
|
39
−28.2%
|
Fortnite | 85−90
+28.8%
|
65−70
−28.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+31.3%
|
45−50
−31.3%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+34.3%
|
35−40
−34.3%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+39%
|
41
−39%
|
Metro Exodus | 30−35
+39.1%
|
21−24
−39.1%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+40%
|
40−45
−40%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+37.9%
|
27−30
−37.9%
|
Valorant | 120−130
+20.6%
|
100−110
−20.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Baldur's Gate 3 | 30−33
+50%
|
20
−50%
|
Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+32.7%
|
45−50
−32.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+39.1%
|
21−24
−39.1%
|
Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+38.9%
|
36
−38.9%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+31.3%
|
45−50
−31.3%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+40%
|
40−45
−40%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+37.9%
|
27−30
−37.9%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 85−90
+28.8%
|
65−70
−28.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+42.9%
|
21−24
−42.9%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 110−120
+31.8%
|
85−90
−31.8%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+41.2%
|
16−18
−41.2%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
+46.2%
|
12−14
−46.2%
|
Valorant | 150−160
+26%
|
120−130
−26%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Baldur's Gate 3 | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+43.3%
|
30−33
−43.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+40%
|
10−11
−40%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+37.5%
|
24−27
−37.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+37%
|
27−30
−37%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+43.8%
|
16−18
−43.8%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 30−35
+41.7%
|
24−27
−41.7%
|
4K
High Preset
Baldur's Gate 3 | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+27.3%
|
21−24
−27.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−12
+57.1%
|
7−8
−57.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+50%
|
14−16
−50%
|
Valorant | 80−85
+40%
|
60−65
−40%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Baldur's Gate 3 | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+46.7%
|
14−16
−46.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+45.5%
|
10−12
−45.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+36.8%
|
18−20
−36.8%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+36.4%
|
10−12
−36.4%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 14−16
+36.4%
|
10−12
−36.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
This is how Arc Graphics 130T and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130T is 21% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 244% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130T is ahead in 59 tests (94%)
- there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.