RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Arc A770

Place in performance ranking	193	25
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.45	1.71
Architecture	Alchemist	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	DG2-512	AD102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)	9 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329	no data
Current price	$597 (1.8x MSRP)	$5296

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A770 has 570% better value for money than RTX 5000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	12800
Core clock speed	2100 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	614.4	1,020

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770 25.85

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 63.46
+145%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A770 by 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A770 9984

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 24507
+145%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A770 by 145% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	109 −139%	260−270 +139%
1440p	67 −139%	160−170 +139%
4K	42 −138%	100−110 +138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−163%

40−45
+163%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −171%	65 +171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −163%	92 +163%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −152%	50−55 +152%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −163%	40−45 +163%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −146%	55−60 +146%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −148%	65−70 +148%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −175%	33 +175%
Hitman 3	21−24 −148%	50−55 +148%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −154%	203 +154%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −162%	144 +162%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −152%	65−70 +152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −153%	304 +153%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −155%	102 +155%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −167%	56 +167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −163%	79 +163%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −152%	50−55 +152%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −163%	40−45 +163%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −146%	55−60 +146%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −148%	65−70 +148%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −147%	110−120 +147%
Hitman 3	21−24 −148%	50−55 +148%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −155%	100−110 +155%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −158%	129 +158%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −152%	65−70 +152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 −158%	258 +158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −161%	196 +161%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −170%	70−75 +170%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −150%	45 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −167%	72 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −152%	50−55 +152%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −163%	40−45 +163%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −146%	55−60 +146%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −156%	23 +156%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −169%	121 +169%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −154%	216 +154%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −167%	72 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −147%	74 +147%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−152%

65−70
+152%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −166%	133 +166%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −150%	40 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −150%	60 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −183%	16−18 +183%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −173%	82 +173%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −150%	15 +150%
Hitman 3	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −150%	100 +150%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −160%	91 +160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −163%	158 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −150%	60 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −146%	59 +146%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−169%

40−45
+169%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Hitman 3	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −172%	49 +172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −170%	73 +170%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −150%	30 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −171%	38 +171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −167%	8 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −171%	65 +171%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −167%	56 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −164%	37 +164%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−175%

21−24

+175%

This is how Arc A770 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 139% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 139% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 138% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.85	63.46
Recency	12 October 2022	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	250 Watt