L4 vs Arc A750

Place in the ranking	186	359
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	54.53	no data
Power efficiency	9.71	14.79
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	DG2-512	AD104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$289	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	7424
Core clock speed	2050 MHz	795 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	72 Watt
Texture fill rate	537.6	489.6
Floating-point processing power	17.2 TFLOPS	30.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	112	80
TMUs	224	240
Tensor Cores	448	240
Ray Tracing Cores	28	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	169 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	300.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9
DLSS	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A750 27.57
+105%

L4 13.44

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A750 12322
+105%

L4 6006

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	107 +114%	50−55 −114%
1440p	61 +126%	27−30 −126%
4K	36 +125%	16−18 −125%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.70	no data
1440p	4.74	no data
4K	8.03	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	164 +119%	75−80 −119%
Counter-Strike 2	336 +110%	160−170 −110%
Cyberpunk 2077	75 +114%	35−40 −114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	123 +124%	55−60 −124%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +124%	50−55 −124%
Counter-Strike 2	270 +108%	130−140 −108%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 +120%	30−33 −120%
Far Cry 5	111 +122%	50−55 −122%
Fortnite	130−140 +112%	65−70 −112%
Forza Horizon 4	112 +124%	50−55 −124%
Forza Horizon 5	132 +120%	60−65 −120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +116%	55−60 −116%
Valorant	190−200 +111%	90−95 −111%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	89 +123%	40−45 −123%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +124%	50−55 −124%
Counter-Strike 2	144 +106%	70−75 −106%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 +110%	130−140 −110%
Cyberpunk 2077	58 +115%	27−30 −115%
Far Cry 5	102 +127%	45−50 −127%
Fortnite	130−140 +112%	65−70 −112%
Forza Horizon 4	106 +112%	50−55 −112%
Forza Horizon 5	121 +120%	55−60 −120%
Grand Theft Auto V	99 +120%	45−50 −120%
Metro Exodus	105 +110%	50−55 −110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +116%	55−60 −116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	185 +106%	90−95 −106%
Valorant	190−200 +111%	90−95 −111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +124%	50−55 −124%
Cyberpunk 2077	55 +129%	24−27 −129%
Far Cry 5	98 +118%	45−50 −118%
Forza Horizon 4	90 +125%	40−45 −125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +116%	55−60 −116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	69 +130%	30−33 −130%
Valorant	190−200 +111%	90−95 −111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

130−140

+112%

65−70
−112%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	89 +123%	40−45 −123%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	200−210 +107%	100−105 −107%
Grand Theft Auto V	41 +128%	18−20 −128%
Metro Exodus	65 +117%	30−33 −117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +106%	85−90 −106%
Valorant	220−230 +106%	110−120 −106%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +129%	35−40 −129%
Cyberpunk 2077	42 +133%	18−20 −133%
Far Cry 5	76 +117%	35−40 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	79 +126%	35−40 −126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 +111%	27−30 −111%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

75−80
+114%

35−40

−114%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Counter-Strike 2	20 +122%	9−10 −122%
Grand Theft Auto V	45 +114%	21−24 −114%
Metro Exodus	43 +139%	18−20 −139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	69 +130%	30−33 −130%
Valorant	170−180 +111%	85−90 −111%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +124%	21−24 −124%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +106%	16−18 −106%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +130%	10−11 −130%
Far Cry 5	45 +114%	21−24 −114%
Forza Horizon 4	61 +126%	27−30 −126%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +119%	16−18 −119%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

35−40
+119%

16−18

−119%

This is how Arc A750 and L4 compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 114% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 126% faster in 1440p
Arc A750 is 125% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	27.57	13.44
Recency	12 October 2022	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	72 Watt

Arc A750 has a 105.1% higher aggregate performance score.

L4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the L4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A750 is a desktop card while L4 is a workstation one.